Congress has a ten percent approval rating. How do incumbents in Congress keep getting re-elected? One reason is political gerrymandering. - by Dan Allie Since the term gerrymandering originated here in Massachusetts, there is no point in debating whether or not gerrymandering exists in Massachusetts. To be fair, both political parties are guilty of political gerrymandering. Democrats in Massachusetts will point out Republicans in Texas use similar tactics. But what does that have to do with us recognizing our own problems with political manipulation by a ruling party? Both are fundamentally unfair and nothing our elected leaders should defend or play a part in. Political gerrymandering does not serve the public, or lead to free and fair elections. Just as racial gerrymandering is designed to hold down minority candidates, political gerrymandering is designed to keep all challenger candidates from a level playing field and in the minority. The people of Massachusetts who you have sworn to represent deserve, openness and transparency and good government by the consent of the governed. While this committee certainly should consider the input of our Democrat-controlled congressional delegation regarding the needs of the districts, one questions the thinking behind having our congressmen holding a fundraiser in Washington DC for a state rep leader of the committee or why meetings were not held openly rather than exclusively behind closed doors. Everything in nature has a balance. There is no such balance in our government here in Massachusetts. As a result, common sense rules, reforms and proposals are voted down at the beginning of every legislative session. The residents and taxpayers of Massachusetts would be better served by open discussions of important issues and vigorous debate of opposing ideas. Instead we are left with a lopsided majority, where dissent has little place or hope of succeeding, where new ideas have little chance of moving forward and the last three speakers of the house have been indicted. I ask this committee to consider some common sense proposals Districts should not be designed to split a town if the population allows it to fit into one state representative district. Towns such as Chicopee and Chelmsford should not split up into many districts. Towns in a state representative district be grouped together when part of a school region. I would like to remind this committee that a government that insulates itself from the will of the people is not a democracy, and one that manipulates the law to suit itself is not a republic. Common Sense Proposals Kurt Hayes, a Republicans candidate for state rep in the 37th Middlesex district and I have written letters to various newspapers attempting to give voice to this issue and how it affects fair elections. Districts should not be designed to split a town if the population allows it to fit into one state representative district. Towns in a state representative district should be grouped together when part of a school region. Add your voice and help hold our elected officials accountable. Attend a public hearing, write a letter to the editor, call talk radio and talk with your friends and neighbors. Kurt says, "the more voices calling for openness and transparency the better." Contact your state legislator and ask when public hearings will be held. Demand free and fair elections. www.malegislature.gov/People/FindMyLegislator The state has created a web site on redistricting including the history and a calendar of public hearings. http://www.malegislature.gov/District |